Comments on: Google urges IE6 lusers to get a Browser http://rawdev.net/2009/01/02/google-urges-ie6-lusers-to-get-a-browser/ Just another Zabreznik.si Sites site Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:33:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Stephen http://rawdev.net/2009/01/02/google-urges-ie6-lusers-to-get-a-browser/#comment-54 Stephen Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:41:30 +0000 http://www.rawdev.net/2009/01/02/google-urges-ie6-lusers-to-get-a-browser/#comment-54 Chrome might be an option if they port it to Win2k. Chrome might be an option if they port it to Win2k.

]]> By: Hekos http://rawdev.net/2009/01/02/google-urges-ie6-lusers-to-get-a-browser/#comment-53 Hekos Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:12:35 +0000 http://www.rawdev.net/2009/01/02/google-urges-ie6-lusers-to-get-a-browser/#comment-53 DOliva, you really should try Google's Chrome. The interface is almost non-existent, its one of the fastest out there and it will let you see pages the way they are intended. Believe me, you are missing out on a lot ;) I am quite limited to certain browsers do to my line of work, so I must partly agree with you, it sometimes gets really bloated ;( Cheers. DOliva, you really should try Google’s Chrome. The interface is almost non-existent, its one of the fastest out there and it will let you see pages the way they are intended. Believe me, you are missing out on a lot ;)

I am quite limited to certain browsers do to my line of work, so I must partly agree with you, it sometimes gets really bloated ;(

Cheers.

]]> By: DOliva http://rawdev.net/2009/01/02/google-urges-ie6-lusers-to-get-a-browser/#comment-52 DOliva Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:07:01 +0000 http://www.rawdev.net/2009/01/02/google-urges-ie6-lusers-to-get-a-browser/#comment-52 I for one, have found no browser that I liked better then IE6. It's got a small footprint (memory/cpu) because it's not trying to be an application provider.. it's trying to be a browser. The browser interface components are small and out of the way. This maintains the focus on the content, not the browser. When I find a browser that I like better, I'll move. So far, I have not. Less is more. Back to the basics, folks. A capable graphical browser with a small foot print with the focus on content. Browsers should not have self ego love. I for one, have found no browser that I liked better then IE6. It’s got a small footprint (memory/cpu) because it’s not trying to be an application provider.. it’s trying to be a browser. The browser interface components are small and out of the way. This maintains the focus on the content, not the browser. When I find a browser that I like better, I’ll move. So far, I have not. Less is more. Back to the basics, folks. A capable graphical browser with a small foot print with the focus on content. Browsers should not have self ego love.

]]>